The Presbyterian Church of Plumville

Growing in Faith Together

 

Let’s have Christ our president, Let’s have him for our king

Cast your vote for the Carpenter that you call the Nazarene.

-Woody Guthrie

So, I’m watching the Daily Show on Comedy Central and there is one of those peculiar moments where the sheer dignity of humanity shines through the utter irreverence of American satire.  The current President of Bolivia, Evo Morales, probably by virtue of some blind flier by the booking agent for the Daily Show, was the guest.  I’m not sure they even knew what they were getting.  Morales was elected President of his country despite the fact that he was not a politician by trade, despite the fact that he doesn’t have a high school diploma, despite the fact that he is, well, “indigenous.”  The last category is perhaps the most surprising and damning category for a person from Central or South America, for reasons too deep to go into here the descendents of the Spanish and Portugese colonials have managed to retain almost complete control of the economic and political power in nations south of Texas.  The descendants of the Maya, Aztecs and Inca have been marginalized to the point where most of the world doesn’t even know they exist.  To avoid any tint of self-righteousness, I should note that North American “indigenous” peoples were treated as badly if not worse, and there are fewer of them left to tell the tale.

            But here is Morales, a man elected on a ground swell of popular democratic enthusiasm, who defies all the bugaboos that haunt the modern politician, his campaign was focused on several simple planks, promises made to the people by one of their own.  All of his campaign promises, none of which were exactly small potatoes, were accomplished within eight months of his election.  This fact inspired Jon Stewart to exclaim, “What are you trying to pull?!”  To which Morales, once his translator had told him what was said, simply chuckled quietly.  I’m not sure Morales understands the deep frustration that inspired Stewart’s remark, and I’m actually glad if he doesn’t.  We live in a land where we expect that politicians will lie to us and we don’t hold it against them.  We expect campaign promises to be empty, we accept that our elected officials will quickly bog down and become entrenched in endless bureaucracy, and we get exactly what we deserve.

            I found myself wishing that Morales was my President.  Honestly I don’t know much about his politics but I admired his simple dignity, his plain vision and what seemed to be an utter lack of duplicity.  He had an idea of how to “fix” several of his nation’s most pressing problems.  He was elected and promptly proceeded to do what he said he was going to do!  Shocking, I know, but imagine the possibilities!  If we would hold our politicians accountable to their promises in the same way McDonalds holds it’s employees responsible for certain duties we might actually get somewhere.  But we let the “complicated” nature of our problems paralyze us, in short we are afraid to fail and thus we will never overcome the adaptive challenges of our day.  Morales, right or wrong, seemed to have very little doubt that what he had done was the right move.

            I think I would rather deal with the consequences of poorly conceived action than with the paralysis of bureaucratic indecision.  We really don’t know how to live with what we have wrought.  It is encouraging to see at least some nations on the globe stop trying to emulate America and becoming what they should be.  I lament the fact that once upon a time America was the trail-blazer, boldly carving it’s own destiny and that now we have lost our chutzpah.  Sure, mistakes were made, our development was brutal, dirty and tragic in many ways but the most valuable lessons are learned from mistakes.  Slavery, the Civil War, segregation, police brutality in Birmingham, all lead to the civil rights movement and a country that is at least philosophically aware of the true value of freedom and the inherent equality of human beings.  Nations that have not gone through the struggle do not understand the value of what we have learned and thus nations around the world still trample human rights and enslave millions.

            Democracy as a process of trial and error is foundational to who we are but we have turned it into a process of trying to always make the right move and thus doing nothing.  If we would simply learn from small failures along the way we might have avoided several of the intractable quagmires of recent history.  We have seen the cost of decades of poor foreign policy decisions blow up in our faces and trying to correct all of those mistakes in one fell swoop has not panned out so well.  But the way we have it set up now it behooves politicians to try and avoid consequences rather than learning from them.  You can’t blame them, they know what they know, and they know our system of bureaucracy, just like the Pharisees of Jesus’ day.  Woody thought that Jesus would make a good President but I guess he got himself assassinated about two thousand years too early.  I don’t suppose writing Jesus of Nazareth on the ballot in 2008 would do much good, but I’d at least like the chance to vote for an honest man instead of a politician once in my life, and I don’t really want to move to Bolivia.

Addendum October 2007: Okay so things are not working out so hot for Evo Morales.  I saw in the news the other day that his country is experiencing some fairly significant turmoil.  Apparently the wealthy classes are none to happy about Morales socializing their natural resources.  Who would have figured that wealthy capitalists would be against socialism, hmmm?  It also seems that at least some of the poor and working classes think that Evo, who was supposed to be their guy, has sold them out in making some concessions to the upper class in order to prevent full scale revolt.  Politics are tough.  I wonder whether Jesus would even accept the nomination.


 I’m Sorry You’re Offended

Perhaps the most patronizing and muddle-headed line I have ever heard, “I’m sorry you’re offended.”  It is bandied about by those who either apparently have very little esteem for their own opinions (yet nevertheless will not change them) or have even less respect for the intelligence and integrity of the wronged party.  Usually I dedicate this space to reflection on some theological point, using literate quotations and balanced thinking but I’ve just finished reading the post 216th General Assembly issue of The Layman.  For those of you not familiar with the publications that float about the Presbyterian Church (USA), The Layman, is a monthly publication that speaks the concerns of our more conservative leaning brethren.  Reading The Layman almost always makes me angry, not because I disagree with them or because they are wrong, if I thought that I could just write them off or not read them at all.  The Layman presents events in the PCUSA from a certain viewpoint, a conservative, evangelical Christian viewpoint.  I read The Layman because despite their one-sided approach to the issues they vent frustrations that I feel about our denomination.  They write vituperative articles about the increasing moral abominations of our political body for which I lack the inside knowledge and sustained bile level.

            Personally I gravitate towards the slightly more moderate but still evangelical stances of Presbyterians for Renewal (PFR) and generally find a more well balanced approach to the issues.  It is of great importance to me that the political pundits of our Church have a solid awareness of Biblical authority and Christian moral standards, after that let the vitriolic histrionics flow, they are important parts of my own personal sanity as a Presbyterian Pastor, to know that I am not the only one who is disgusted by our denominations continued laxity in regard to the greatest moral disaster of our time.  The disaster in question has nothing to do with homosexuals or buggery, it has to do with the killing of thousands upon thousands of unborn children for medically unjustifiable reasons.  The homosexual issues get the bulk of the press, meanwhile babies are killed, sacrificed to Moloch on the white hot arms of convenience and comfort.  Talk yourself into the illusion that is about women’s reproductive rights, talk yourself into the illusion that they are not really human beings, go ahead, I won’t judge you but you better be right or else God will not be a pleased creator.

            Oh, by the way, “I’m sorry if you’re offended.”  Not really, I’m not sorry in the least if you are offended by the truth.  That was what set off this little ramble, in the current issue of The Layman there is a sorry tale of an East-African Presbyterian, the moderator of the East-African Presbyterian Church no less.  A man who leads a Church that is larger, though poorer, than our esteemed PCUSA.  An educated and seemingly faithful man who came to the General Assembly to have his voice heard and was treated shamefully.  There was no celebration of the success of his Church at spreading the Gospel, there was no celebration of the diversity of his views, he was ignored, marginalized and ultimately patronized by the powers that be in the General Assembly.  Did I mention that the East-African Church is outraged about the whole homosexuality issue?  They are.  Our African brothers and sisters cannot fathom how American Churches are making such a mess of things, the Anglican Church in Africa blew a gasket over the consecration of an openly homosexual Episcopalian Bishop, the Presbyterian Churches in Africa are probably afraid that our PCUSA might make the same tragic mistake.

            According to the admittedly one sided account given in The Layman, our outgoing moderator, Susan Andrews, tried to patch things up with our East-African brother but he would not hear it until she apologized for her pro-ordination of homosexual politics.  The best she could muster was an, “I’m sorry you’re offended” apology.  She does not repent of her un-biblical, immoral support of an issue that has been repeatedly rejected by the heart and soul of our denomination.  She is sorry that someone else is offended.  She is apologizing for the justifiable feelings of another adult human, how disrespectful!  She is treating a man who holds a doctorate like he is not even entitled to be outraged over this issue!

            I don’t even know what to say.  If this is the level of dialogue over the issue we are doomed.  The side that wears rainbow colors and proclaims diversity doesn’t even respect diverse opinions enough to validate their disagreement.  In fact they don’t seem to respect their own entrenched opinions enough to engage in open dialogue about the possible unholy flaws in their argument.  They paint the opposition as homophobes; they call Biblical morals outdated and irrelevant; they continue to push an issue that should be resolved by now.  I could go on but that’s really politics, not theology and theology is supposedly what this is about.  The theology is simple, God said what he does and doesn’t like in the Bible, he does like people who can disagree without hating one another, he does like those who stand up for the truth, he doesn’t like fornication and unnatural lust for the same sex, he especially doesn’t like societies that kill their own children.  I guess the issue is whether or not you're comfortable calling the Creator of the Universe a liar, maybe he’ll go easy on you if you tell him you’re sorry He’s offended.



Progress